Plant and soil carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential in four major bamboo species of North India

Authors

  • Kavita Tariyal Department of Applied Sciences & Humanities, THDC Institute of Hydropower Engineering & Technology, Bhagirthipuram, Tehri Garhwal-249001, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Asha Upadhyay Department of Environmental Sciences and G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263145, Uttarakhand, India.
  • Salil Tewari Department of Genetics & Plant Breeding, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263145, Uttarakhand, India
  • Uma Melkania Department of Environmental Sciences and G.B. Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar-263145, Uttarakhand, India

Keywords:

Bambusa balcooa, Bambusa nutans, Bambusa vulgaris, Carbon sequestration, Carbon stock, Climate change, Dendrocalamus strictus, Microbial biomass carbon, Soil respiration

Abstract

With climate change being unequivocal, reducing CO2 in our atmosphere has become a primary goal of international efforts. Carbon sequestration is the process characteristic of the species employed for plantation but depends on the continuous management of the plantation also. Assessment of carbon stocks in vegetation and soil is a basic step in evaluating the carbon sequestration potential of an ecosystem. The present study was conducted to quantify the total carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential in four bamboo plantation systems (Dendrocalamus strictus, Bambusa vulgaris, Bambusa balcooa and Bambusa nutans) in the Terai belt of Uttarakhand, India for two years. The major parameters of the study involved physicochemical characteristics of the soil, structural and functional attributes of microbes, and carbon stocks and carbon sequestration potential in vegetation and soil. Destructive approach was used for biomass estimation. At the end of the study, soil organic carbon stocks in the plantations Dendrocalamus strictus, Bambusa vulgaris, Bambusa balcooa and Bambusa nutans were 106.56 t ha-1, 85.06 t ha-1, 65.40 t ha-1, and 57.28 t ha-1 respectively. With this, the highest carbon sequestration potential was observed in Dendrocalamus strictus plantation soil. The observed average soil respiration (1426.45mg CO2 m-2 hr-1) and microbial biomass carbon (0.212%) were also highest in D. strictus among all species. Carbon stock was found more in biomass than in soil in all bamboo species. Thus, the present study clearly demonstrates that besides being an economic strength bamboo plant have shown encouraging results in the field of carbon sequestration potential also and it can be a better climate change mitigation option because of several environmental benefits.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, A.S. & Schlesinger, W.H. (2004). Nutrient limitations to soil microbial biomass and activity in loblolly pine forests. Soil Biol. Biochem., 36(4): 581–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2003.12.002.

Benbi, D.K. & Nieder, R. (Eds) (2003). Handbook of processes and modeling in the soil-plant system. The Haworth Press Inc, New York. pp-762.

Black, C.A. (Ed.) (1965). Methods of soil analysis. Part I and II, American Society of Agronomy Inc., Medison, Wisconsin, USA.

Brady, N.C. (1990). The Nature and properties of soils. 10th Edition, Macmillan Publishing Company, pp. 621.

Choudhary, M.L., Salam, K. & Deka, N.K. (Eds) (2008). One year of National Bamboo Mission in the states of NE Region, West Bengal, Orissa, Jharkhand & Bihar 2007-2008. Cane & Bamboo Technology Centre, Guwahati, Assam, India.

de M. Sá, J.C., Cerri, C.C., Dick, W.A., Lal, R., Filho, S.P.V., Piccolo, M.C. & Feigl, B.E. (2001). Organic Matter Dynamics and Carbon Sequestration Rates for a Tillage Chronosequence in a Brazilian Oxisol. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 65(5): 1486–1499. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2001.6551486x.

Deka, H.K. & Mishra, R.R. (1982). Decomposition of bamboo (Dendrocalamus hamiltonii Nees.) leaflitter in relation to age of jhum fallows in Northeast India. Plant Soil, 68(2): 151–159. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02373701.

Dilly, O., Blume, H.P., Sehy, U., Jimenez, M. & Munch, J.C. (2003). Variation of stabilised, microbial and biologically active carbon and nitrogen in soil under contrasting land use and agricultural management practices. Chemosphere, 52(3): 557–569. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(03)00237-6.

Doran, J.W. & Parkin, T.B. (1994). Defining and assessing soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F. & Stewart, B.A. (Eds), Defining Soil Quality for a Sustainable Environment. Soil Science Society of America Special Publication No 35, Madison, WI., pp. 3-21.

Gallardo, A. & Merino, J. (1993). Leaf Decomposition in Two Mediterranean Ecosystems of Southwest Spain: Influence of Substrate Quality. Ecology, 74(1): 152–161. https://doi.org/10.2307/1939510.

Geetha, T. & Balagopalan, M. (2005). Soils as influenced by teak and eucalyptus plantations - A case study in Peechi-Vazhani Wildlife Sanctuary, Kerala. J. of Soils and Crops, 15(2): 264-268.

Ghavami, K. (2005). Bamboo as reinforcement in structural concrete elements. Cem. Concr. Compos., 27(6): 637–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2004.06.002.

Hosur, G.C. & Dasog, G.S. (1995). Effect of tree species on soil properties. J. Indian Soc. Soil Sci., 43: 256-259.

INBAR (2006). In partnership for a better world – strategy to the year 2015. Beijing, China: International Network for Bamboo and Rattan, p. 23.

IPCC (2007). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden and C.E. Hanson, Eds., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp. 7-22.

Janssens, I.A., Lankreijer, H., Matteucci, G., Kowalski, A.S., Buchmann, N., Epron, D., Pilegaard, K., Kutsch, W., Longdoz, B., Grünwald, T. et al. (2001). Productivity overshadows temperature in determining soil and ecosystem respiration across European forests. Global Change Biol., 7(3): 269–278. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2001.00412.x.

Jiang-shan, Z., Jian-fen, G., Guang-shui, C. & Wei, Q. (2005). Soil microbial biomass and its controls. J. For. Res., 16(4): 327–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858201.

Jingyi, X., Jianwei, T., Liqing, S., Ying, M., Jianguo, H., Xianming, G., Jianhong, D., Wengui, D. & Wenyong, D. (2002). Variation of soil nutrient dynamics under Dendrocalamus membranaceus forest in Xishuangbanna. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 30(5): 27–31.

Killham, K. (1994). Soil ecology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 242.

Klose, S. & Tabatabai, M.A. (1999). Urease activity of microbial biomass in soils. Soil Biol. Biochem., 31(2): 205–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0717(98)00090-X.

Kumar, A. & Kumari, S. (2010). Sustainable development and bamboo cultivation for combating climate change in the Indian Context –a review. The Bioscan, 1: 135 -140.

Lal, R. (2008). Carbon sequestration. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci., 363(1492): 815–830. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2185.

Landsberg, J.J., Linder, S. & McMurtrie, R.E. (1995). Effects of global change on managed forests. A strategic plan for research on managing forest ecosystems in a globally changing environment. Global Change and Terrestrial Ecosystems report no. 4. Core Project of the IGBP, Canberra, pp. 1-17.

Lugo, A.E. & Brown, S. (1993). Management of tropical soils as sinks or sources of atmospheric carbon. Plant Soil, 149(1): 27–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00010760.

Myrold, D.D. (1987). Relationship Between Microbial Biomass Nitrogen and a Nitrogen Availability Index. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 51(4): 1047–1049. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1987.03615995005100040040x.

Naithani, H.B. (1993). Contribution to the taxonomic studies of Indian Bamboos. Ph.D. Thesis, Vol. I., H.N.B. Garhwal University, Srinagar, Garhwal.

Nath, A.J. & Das, A.K. (2007). Carbon pool and carbon sequestration potential of village bamboos in the agroforestry system of North-east India. In International Tropical Ecology Congress, Abstract. HNB Garhwal University, Uttarakhand and International Society for Tropical Ecology, Varanasi, 2–5 December 2007, p. 159.

Nath, A.J. & Das, A.K. (2011). Carbon storage and sequestration in bamboo-based smallholder homegardens of Barak Valley, Assam. Curr. Sci., 100(2): 229–233.

Nath, A.J., Das, G. & Das, A.K. (2008). Above ground biomass, production and carbon sequestration in farmer managed village bamboo grove in Assam, northeast India. J. Am. Bamboo Soc., 21(1): 32–40.

Nath, A.J., Das, G. & Das, A.K. (2009). Above ground standing biomass and carbon storage in village bamboos in North East India. Biomass Bioenergy, 33(9): 1188–1196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.05.020.

NMBA (2004). The bamboo book. National mission on bamboo applications. New Delhi: Department of Science and Technology. pp. 5–19.

Oelbermann, M., Paul Voroney, R. & Gordon, A.M. (2004). Carbon sequestration in tropical and temperate agroforestry systems: a review with examples from Costa Rica and southern Canada. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ., 104(3): 359–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2004.04.001.

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. & Dean, L.A. (1954). Estimation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Washington. D.C. Circular no. 939.

Patil, V.D., Sarnikar, P.N., Adsul, P.B. & Thengal, P.D. (2004). Profile studies, organic matter build up and nutritional status of soil under bamboo (Dendrocalamus strictus) based agroforestry system. Journal of Soils and Crops, 14(1): 31-35.

PIA (2008). Bamboo as carbon sequester and income booster. Non Wood News. Philippine Information Agency, p 17.

Puri, S., Swamy, S.L. & Jaiswal, A.K. (2002). Evaluation of Populus deltoides clones under nursery, field and agrisilviculture system in subhumid tropics of Central India. New For., 23(1): 45–61. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015620915654.

Ram, N., Singh, L. & Kumar, P. (2010). Bamboo plantation diversity and its economic role in North Bihar, India. Nat. Sci., 8(11): 111-115.

Ranjan, N.P. (2000). Rethinking Bamboo in 2000 AD. GTZ/INBAR Workshop on Bamboo and Rattan 2000 from 12 to 21 April 2000 at Hinan and YunnanProvinces of China.

Ravindranath, N.H., Joshi, N.V., Sukumar, R. & Saxena, A. (2006). Impact of climate change on forests in India. Curr. Sci., 90(3): 354-361.

Reichstein, M., Rey, A., Freibauer, A., Tenhunen, J., Valentini, R., Banza, J., Casals, P., Cheng, Y., Grünzweig, J.M., Irvine, J., Joffre, R., Law, B.E. et al. (2003). Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices. Global Biogeochem. Cycles, 17(4): 1104. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003GB002035.

Scurlock, J.M.O., Dayton, D.C. & Hames, B. (2000). Bamboo: an overlooked biomass resource? Biomass Bioenergy, 19(4): 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00038-6.

Shanmughavel, P., Peddappaiah, R.S. & Muthukumar, T. (2001). Biomass production in an age series of Bambusa bambos plantations. Biomass Bioenergy, 20(2): 113–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00069-6.

Shrestha, B.M. & Singh, B.R. (2008). Soil and vegetation carbon pools in a mountainous watershed of Nepal. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 81(2): 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10705-007-9148-9.

Singh, A.N. & Singh, J.S. (1999). Biomass, net primary production and impact of bamboo plantation on soil redevelopment in a dry tropical region. For. Ecol. Manage., 119(1): 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00523-4.

Singh, J. (1984). Effect of temperature, rainfall and soil moisture on soil respiration and litter decomposition in a subtropical humid forest ecosystem. Acta Bot. Indica, 12(2): 167-173.

Singh, K., Chauhan, H.S., Rajput, D.K. & Singh, D.V. (1989). Report of a 60 month study on litter production, changes in soil chemical properties and productivity under Poplar (P. deltoides) and Eucalyptus (E. hybrid) interplanted with aromatic grasses. Agrofor. Syst., 9(1): 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120154.

Singh, L. & Singh, J.S. (1991). Species Structure, Dry Matter Dynamics and Carbon Flux of a Dry Tropical Forest in India. Ann. Bot., 68(3): 263–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a088252.

Singh, P., Dubey, P. & Jha, K.K. (2006). Biomass production and carbon storage at harvest age in superior Dendrocalamus strictus Nees. plantation in dry deciduous forest region of India. Indian J. For., 29(4): 353-360.

Singh, R. & Lal, M. (2000). Sustainable forestry in India for carbon mitigation. Curr. Sci., 78(5): 563-567.

Subbiah, B.V. & Asija, G.L. (1956). A rapid procedure for the estimation of available nitrogen in soils. Curr. Sci., 25: 259-260.

Swamy, S.L., Mishra, A. & Puri, S. (2003). Biomass production and root distribution of Gmelina arborea under an agrisilviculture system in subhumid tropics of Central India. New For., 26(2): 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024478700645.

Swamy, S.L. & Puri, S. (2005). Biomass production and C-sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor. Syst., 64(3): 181–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-004-1999-3.

Tripathi, S.K. & Singh, K.P. (1996). Culm recruitment, dry matter dynamics and carbon flux in recently harvested and mature bamboo savannas in the Indian dry tropics. Ecol. Res., 11(2): 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02347681.

Turco, R.F., Kennedy, A.C. & Jawson, M.D. (1994). Microbial indicators of soil quality. In: Doran, J.W., Coleman, D.C., Bezdicek, D.F. & Stewart, B.A. (eds.), Defining soil quality for a sustainable environment. SSSA Special Publication 35. Madison: Soil Science Society of America, pp. 73-90.

Upadhyaya, K., Arunachalam, A. & Arunachalam, K. (2004). Effect of bamboo foliage on soil respiration, microbial biomass and N mineralization. J. Bamboo and Rattan, 3(2): 169-183.

Vance, E.D., Brookes, P.C. & Jenkinson, D.S. (1987). An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C. Soil Biol. Biochem., 19(6): 703–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(87)90052-6.

Venkatesh, M.S., Bhatt, B.P., Kumar, K., Majumdar, B. & Singh, K. (2005). Soil properties influenced by some important edible bamboo species in the North Eastern Himalayan region. J. Bamboo and Rattan, 4(3): 221-230.

Walkley, A. & Black, I.A. (1934). An Examination of the Degtjareff Method for Determining Soil Organic Matter, and a Proposed Modification of the Chromic Acid Titration Method. Soil Sci., 37(1): 29–38. https://doi.org/10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003

Wang, F.E., Chen, Y.X., Tian, G.M., Kumar, S., He, Y.F., Fu, Q.L. & Lin, Q. (2004). Microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus in the soil profiles of different vegetation covers established for soil rehabilitation in a red soil region of southeastern China. Nutr. Cycling Agroecosyst., 68(2): 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FRES.0000017470.14789.2a.

Witkamp, M. & van der Drift, J. (1961). Breakdown of forest litter in relation to environmental factors. Plant Soil, 15(4): 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01379465.

Wu, J., Joergensen, R.G., Pommerening, B., Chaussod, R. & Brookes, P.C. (1990). Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation-extraction—an automated procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem., 22(8): 1167–1169. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3.

Downloads

Abstract views: 64 / PDF downloads: 44

Published

2013-07-01

How to Cite

Tariyal, K., Upadhyay, A., Tewari, S., & Melkania, U. (2013). Plant and soil carbon stock and carbon sequestration potential in four major bamboo species of North India. Advances in BioScience, 4(3), 100–108. Retrieved from https://journals.sospublication.co.in/ab/article/view/132

Issue

Vol. 4 No. 3 (2013): July

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2013 The author(s) retains the copyright of this article.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.